When a trusted medical professional causes you or a loved one serious harm, the sense of betrayal can be profound. It’s natural to feel that their actions were not just a mistake, but a crime. While medical malpractice is almost always a civil matter, in very rare circumstances, a healthcare provider's conduct can be so egregious that it leads to criminal charges. The distinction between a civil wrong and a criminal act is critical, as it determines how accountability is pursued and what kind of justice is possible.
Schedule a Free Case Evaluation
Key Takeaways about Medical Malpractice Claims
- Medical malpractice cases are predominantly addressed in civil court, with the primary goal of securing financial compensation for the injured patient's losses.
- Criminal charges against a medical professional are exceptionally rare and are typically reserved for cases involving proof of intentional harm, gross recklessness, or fraud.
- The standard of proof required in a criminal case is "beyond a reasonable doubt," which is significantly higher and more difficult to meet than the "preponderance of the evidence" standard used in civil cases.
- A civil lawsuit is initiated and controlled by the injured patient (the plaintiff), whereas criminal charges are brought and prosecuted by the government on behalf of the public.
- The outcome of a successful civil medical malpractice claim is a monetary award for the patient, while a criminal conviction can result in penalties like fines, probation, loss of a medical license, or imprisonment for the provider.
- It is possible for a healthcare provider to face both a civil lawsuit from a patient and separate criminal charges from the state for the same harmful act.
Understanding the Core Difference: Civil vs. Criminal Law
To understand where medical malpractice fits, it’s helpful to look at the two main branches of our justice system: civil law and criminal law. Think of them as two separate roads designed to reach two different destinations.
Civil law handles disputes between private parties, such as individuals or organizations. When a patient sues a doctor or a hospital, it is a civil matter. The goal isn't to put anyone in jail; it's to restore the injured person to the position they were in before the harm occurred, as much as possible. This is usually achieved through financial compensation, known as damages, which covers things like medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering.
Criminal law, on the other hand, involves the government prosecuting someone for breaking a specific law. These cases are about punishing conduct that society has deemed harmful to the public as a whole. The goals are to punish the offender, protect the community, and deter others from committing similar acts. The penalties are things like fines paid to the state, probation, or incarceration.
A useful parallel is a drunk driving accident. The injured driver can file a civil lawsuit against the drunk driver to recover money for their car repairs, medical treatment, and other losses. At the same time, the state can press criminal charges against that same driver for Driving Under the Influence (DUI). The civil case is for the victim’s benefit, while the criminal case is to punish the illegal act of drunk driving. The two cases proceed independently on separate tracks.
What Makes Medical Malpractice a Civil Matter?
The vast majority of medical malpractice claims are civil cases because they are based on the legal concept of negligence. Negligence isn't about a doctor intending to cause harm; it’s about a failure to provide a competent level of care, resulting in an injury to the patient.
In the medical field, this is measured against the "standard of care." The standard of care refers to the level of skill and caution that a reasonably competent healthcare professional with similar training would have provided in the same situation. If a doctor’s performance falls below this accepted standard and their failure directly causes a patient's injury, they have been negligent.
To successfully bring a civil medical malpractice claim in New York, an injured patient must prove four key elements:
- A Doctor-Patient Relationship Existed: This is usually easy to establish. Once a doctor agrees to treat you, they have a professional duty to provide competent care.
- The Provider Was Negligent: The care you received did not meet the established medical standard of care. This often requires testimony from other medical professionals who can explain what should have been done differently.
- The Negligence Caused an Injury: There must be a clear and direct link between the provider's failure and the harm you suffered. It’s not enough that a mistake was made; that mistake must be the cause of your injury.
- The Injury Resulted in Specific Damages: You must have suffered actual, provable harm. This can include economic losses like additional medical expenses and lost wages, as well as non-economic losses like physical pain and emotional distress.
These elements form the foundation of civil claims for things like surgical errors, a delayed diagnosis of cancer, birth injuries, or prescribing the wrong medication. The focus is on the failure to meet a professional standard, not on criminal intent.
When Can Medical Malpractice Become a Criminal Case?
For a medical malpractice case to cross the line from civil to criminal, the provider's actions must go far beyond a simple mistake or a lapse in judgment. The key difference is the provider's state of mind—their intent. A prosecutor must prove that the provider either intended to cause harm or acted with such extreme recklessness that they showed a conscious disregard for human life.
These situations are extremely rare, but they do happen. Examples of conduct that could lead to criminal charges include:
- Assault or Intentional Harm: A doctor purposefully performing a harmful and unnecessary procedure on a patient or physically abusing a patient under their care.
- Operating Under the Influence: A surgeon who performs an operation while intoxicated or high on drugs, demonstrating a shocking and reckless disregard for their patient's safety.
- Healthcare Fraud: A provider who bills insurance companies or government programs like Medicare for complex procedures they never performed, sometimes "covering up" the fraud by performing a different, harmful act on the patient. The U.S. Department of Justice actively prosecutes these cases.
- Unlawful Prescription of Controlled Substances: A doctor running a "pill mill" by knowingly prescribing powerful opioids or other drugs without a legitimate medical purpose.
In these criminal cases, the burden of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt." This is the highest legal standard, requiring the prosecutor to convince a jury that there is no other reasonable explanation for what happened. This is far more challenging to meet than the "preponderance of the evidence" standard in a civil case, where you only need to show that it's more likely than not that your claim is true.
Comparing the Goals and Outcomes of Civil and Criminal Cases
Understanding the fundamental differences in purpose and potential results can help clarify which path is appropriate for seeking justice after a medical injury. Each system is designed to achieve a different kind of accountability.
- Who Initiates the Case? In a civil medical malpractice lawsuit, the injured patient or their family (the plaintiff) is in control. You decide whether to file a claim and when to accept a settlement. In a criminal case, the government (represented by a district attorney or prosecutor) makes all the decisions. A patient can report a crime, but they do not control whether charges are filed.
- What is the Primary Goal? The goal of a civil case is to secure compensation for the plaintiff. It is about addressing the patient's individual financial, physical, and emotional damages. The goal of a criminal case is to punish the defendant for breaking the law and to protect the public from future harm.
- What is the Standard of Proof? A civil case requires proving your claim by a "preponderance of the evidence," which basically means showing your version of events is more than 50% likely to be true. A criminal case requires the prosecutor to prove guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt," a much higher standard reflecting that a person's liberty is at stake.
- What is the Potential Outcome? A successful civil lawsuit results in a monetary award paid by the negligent provider (or their insurance company) to the injured patient. A criminal conviction can result in penalties such as fines paid to the government, probation, community service, loss of a medical license through bodies like the New York State Office of Professional Medical Conduct, or even jail or prison time.
It is important to remember that these two systems can operate at the same time. A doctor who is prosecuted for a crime can also be sued in civil court by the patient they harmed. In fact, because the burden of proof is lower in a civil case, it is possible for a patient to win their civil lawsuit even if the doctor is found "not guilty" in their criminal trial.
Why a Civil Lawsuit is the Primary Path for Justice for Patients in New York
For those harmed by medical errors, the civil justice system is the most direct and effective path toward accountability. While the idea of criminal charges may feel emotionally satisfying, the criminal system is not designed to help you pay for ongoing medical care, make up for lost income, or compensate you for your pain. The civil system is.
Whether you received care at a world-renowned hospital in Manhattan or a community clinic in the Bronx, all healthcare providers in New York are held to a professional standard of care. When they fail to meet that standard, a civil lawsuit allows you to seek justice for the direct consequences of their negligence.
Under New York law, individuals harmed by medical negligence generally have two years and six months from the date of the incident to file a lawsuit. This is known as the statute of limitations. A civil claim allows you to pursue compensation for a wide range of losses, which are often categorized as:
- Economic Damages: These are the tangible financial costs associated with your injury. They include all past and future medical bills, lost wages from being unable to work, and the cost of any future care, therapy, or medical equipment you may need.
- Non-Economic Damages: This category covers the profound, non-financial impact of the injury on your life. It includes compensation for physical pain, emotional anguish, scarring or disfigurement, and the loss of your ability to enjoy daily activities.
- Punitive Damages: In very rare cases where a provider’s conduct was malicious or outrageously reckless, a court may award punitive damages. These are not meant to compensate the patient but to punish the defendant and deter similar behavior in the future.
A civil lawsuit empowers you to tell your story and hold the responsible parties directly accountable for the harm they caused you and your family. It is a powerful tool designed specifically to address the needs of an injured patient and provide the resources essential for recovery and future stability.
Medical Malpractice FAQs
Here are answers to some common questions that arise when trying to understand the legal avenues for a medical injury.
Can a hospital be held responsible in a civil case, or is it only the doctor?
Yes, a hospital or medical facility can often be held responsible. This can happen through a legal principle called vicarious liability, where an employer is responsible for the negligent acts of its employees. A hospital can also be held directly liable for its own negligence, such as failing to properly screen its staff, being understaffed, or not having proper policies and procedures in place.
If a doctor loses their medical license, do I still have a civil case?
Absolutely. The proceedings to revoke a medical license are separate administrative actions handled by a state medical board. A license revocation does not prevent you from filing a civil lawsuit to seek financial compensation for your injuries. The two processes are independent of one another.
What if I signed a consent form before my procedure? Does that prevent a lawsuit?
Signing a consent form does not give a doctor permission to be negligent. A consent form is your acknowledgment that you understand the known risks of a procedure that can occur even when everything is done correctly. It is not a waiver of your right to competent medical care. If your injury was caused by a mistake that fell below the standard of care, rather than an accepted risk, you may still have a valid claim.
Schedule a Confidential Consultation
At Queller Fisher, we focus on providing dedicated, personalized attention to individuals and families dealing with significant, life-altering injuries. Our firm is built on a foundation of thorough preparation and high-quality legal work. We are a selective, low-volume practice, which allows us to give each case the in-depth focus it deserves.
If you believe you or a loved one was harmed by medical negligence, we invite you to contact us. We can help you understand the difference between a civil and criminal matter, evaluate your situation, and explain your rights in plain, simple language.
Our compassionate team is here to listen to your story and provide clear guidance on the path forward. Reach out today at (212) 406-1700 or through our online form for a free, confidential consultation to learn how we can help.